专题频道: ·房地产法· 婚姻法· 刑法· 劳动法· 合同法 ·公司法· 证券法 ·行政法· 民法· 知识产权法· 交通安全法·物权法·反垄断法

法律吧上海站


相关链接:

您现在的位置: 法律吧 >> 法律英语 >> 法律术语 >> 文章正文
 
 -法律英语导读(21)
              编缉:佚名 来源: 不详   整理:法律吧 点击数: 关闭 点击进入:法律咨询热线



法律英语导读(21)

  Case Example: Officer Roy Altie responds to a call to investigate a purse-snatching(抢包) incident. The officer learns from the victim that the culprit was a white male, about 5' 10" tall, weighing about 175 pounds and wearing a light-colored sweatshirt. About 10 minutes later, about a mile from where the purse-snatching took place, Officer Altie sees a man generally fitting the attacker's description walking alone. Officer Altie realizes that he lacks sufficient evidence to make an arrest, and approaches the man merely to question him about his activities and whereabouts during the preceding one-half hour.

  Question: Does Officer Altie have to precede the questioning with the Miranda warning?

  Answer: No. The victim's description was so general that it could apply to many men. Thus, Officer Altie lacked probable cause to make an arrest, and did not intend to make an arrest. Officer Altie was engaged in general on-the-scene questioning, and therefore did not have to give the Miranda warning.

  Police Officers May Mischaracterize a Custodial Situation in Court

  Police officers generally believe that suspects are more likely to speak with them voluntarily in the absence of a Miranda warning. Thus, police officers have an incentive not to give the warning. One way they may attempt to evade the Miranda rule is by delaying the arrest of a suspect until after they're through with the questioning. If an officer can convince a judge that the officer was engaged only in general questioning, and would have let the suspect walk away had the suspect chosen to do so, whatever the suspect says to the officer can be used against the suspect at trial despite the lack of Miranda warnings.

  20. Do the Police Have to Give Me a Miranda Warning If I'm Stopped for a Traffic Violation?

  No, so long as the police officer simply asks a motorist for identification(身份证明) and limits discussion to the traffic offense for which the officer stopped the motorist. Routine traffic violations are infractions(违法,犯规), not crimes. A motorist's statement to a police officer relating to events leading up to a ticket is therefore admissible even if the officer did not give the motorist the Miranda warning. However, a Miranda warning would be required if an officer detains a motorist in order to question the motorist about crimes unrelated to the traffic stop.

  本节的问题:  1、Police officers generally believe that suspects are more likely to speak with them voluntarily in the absence of a Miranda warning.
  2、One way they may attempt to evade the Miranda rule is by delaying the arrest of a suspect until after they're through with the questioning.
  答案:
  1、警官们通常相信在缺乏米兰达警告的情况下,嫌疑犯也可能主动坦白。
  2、他们规避米兰达规则的另一办法是延迟逮捕,直至他们问讯完毕。

沪江博客
                                                                【字体: 】 【打印】 【关闭
  • 上一篇文章:

  • 下一篇文章:


  • 社会热点:
     

    声明:本站所有文章来自网上,仅供网友和法律研究学者交流和学习之用,不以任何商业为目的,如有侵权请告知本站.
    Copyright © 2004-2020 WWW.falvba.net. All rights Reserved. 法律吧 版权所有
    信息产业部备案号:沪ICP备05062559号